Comments on: The neglected dark side of Carbon 60 (C60) https://increaselifespan.net/2022/12/03/the-neglected-dark-side-of-carbon-60/ Science based supplements for health and increase lifespan Sat, 26 Aug 2023 13:22:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Alex Meza https://increaselifespan.net/2022/12/03/the-neglected-dark-side-of-carbon-60/#comment-175 Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:47:21 +0000 http://increaselifespan.net/?p=267#comment-175 In reply to adam mannering.

that was a very insight-full comment you made, Adam. Thank you very much indeed.

]]> By: Steve https://increaselifespan.net/2022/12/03/the-neglected-dark-side-of-carbon-60/#comment-112 Sat, 18 Mar 2023 13:31:58 +0000 http://increaselifespan.net/?p=267#comment-112 How would you know C60 us good or not good to use?

]]> By: Ricardo https://increaselifespan.net/2022/12/03/the-neglected-dark-side-of-carbon-60/#comment-65 Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:54:40 +0000 http://increaselifespan.net/?p=267#comment-65 Thanks for the article, I already doubted C60 and thought was to good to be true.

]]> By: adam mannering https://increaselifespan.net/2022/12/03/the-neglected-dark-side-of-carbon-60/#comment-58 Mon, 05 Dec 2022 01:05:34 +0000 http://increaselifespan.net/?p=267#comment-58 And I’d wager all types of C60 used in the new study were solvent extracted…thus potentially toxic, unlike solvent-free versions.

As someone who’s used it consistently for 5 years, with only benefits (like it’s marked “internal sunscreen” ability, completely negating the need for slathering the usual poison on your skin…), I’m content to keep using it (the solvent-free form only, that is).

]]>